=============================
  Helper Scripts for xxdiff
=============================

:Author: Martin Blais <blais@furius.ca>
:Date: 2006-03-30
:Abstract:

  A description of the Python scripts and infrastructure that is provided around
  xxdiff, to facilitate implementing processes requiring display and selection
  of differences.

.. section-numbering::
.. contents::
..
    1   Introduction
      1.1  History
    2   xxdiff's Decision Mode
    3   Looping and Confirming
      3.1  Backups
      3.2  Write Permissions / Checkout
      3.3  Running Without Graphical Diff
      3.4  Per-File Conditional Replacement
        3.4.1  ``xx-cond-replace``
      3.5  Higher-Level Loops
        3.5.1  Selecting Files
          3.5.1.1  Selecting By Filename
          3.5.1.2  Selecting By Contents
          3.5.1.3  Selecting From A Fixed List
          3.5.1.4  All Options
          3.5.1.5  Debugging The File Selection Process
        3.5.2  ``xx-filter``
        3.5.3  ``xx-rename``
        3.5.4  ``xx-find-grep-sed``
        3.5.5  ``xx-pyline``
        3.5.6  Writing Other Transformation Loops
    4   ``xx-match``
    5   CVS Support
      5.1  ``xx-cvs-diff``
      5.2  Resolving CVS Conflicts
    6   Subversion Support
      6.1  Ignoring .svn Files In Loops
      6.2  ``xx-diff-proxy``
      6.3  ``xx-svn-diff``
        6.3.1  Future Features
      6.4  ``xx-svn-resolve``
      6.5  Handling Unregistered Files
        6.5.1  ``svn-foreign``
    7   Mercurial Support
      7.1  After version 0.9.5
      7.2  Before version 0.9.5
    8   Encrypted Files
      8.1  ``xx-encrypted``
    9   Pre-Visualizing And Cherry-Picking From Patches
    10  Comparing SQL Schemas
    11  Writing Your Own Scripts
    12  Questions


Introduction
============

xxdiff is a computer program that allows a user (usually a software developer of
some sort) to easily visualize the differences between files.  The manner and
goal for which this process is applied over multiple files is highly dependent
on the application, and most of the time is driven by custom user scripts.

For example, a configuration management engineer in a company might provide some
kind of merge policing environment, that allows software developers to review
changes in files for the purpose of accepting or rejecting a submitted changeset
to a codebase.  Another example is that of a developer wishing to review the
changes he made to a checkout of files from a source-code management system such
as CVS, Subversion, ClearCase, Perforce, etc.

History
-------

xxdiff has been developed in a corporate environment with hundreds of users.
Over time, it has been progressively augmented with features to allow it to
better interact with caller scripts, and many of Python scripts were provided as
open source on the internet, to perform various common tasks.  It was only
natural that at some point in time common code between these programs should be
shared in a library, and a Python package provided to ease the task of writing
other, new, custom scripts.

This document describes this package, and the scripts that are provided along
with xxdiff, implemented using the same code.


xxdiff's Decision Mode
======================

The prototypical task of carrying out a merge is that of visualizing and
accepting or rejecting all or some changes to a file, changes from a source file
(e.g. in the case of an update, these are changes forced by other developers) to
a target file (in that case, files living in a developer's own checkout).  There
are three possibilities:

1. Accept all changes to the file;

2. Reject all changes to the file, leaving the target file as is;

3. Accept only some of the changes.  In the great majority of cases, this
   usually only involves selecting diff hunks from either of the files.  It is
   relatively rare to have to edit the files, as this is often related to the
   presence of conflicts, and various SCM systems already provide means to deal
   with those.

xxdiff already provides the ability to interactively select diff hunks from
either files to produce a merged output file.

Therefore, in order to answer the needs above in the context of a script
querying the user for actions to be carried out, a special mode was added to
xxdiff, that *forces* the user to answer with either “accept”, “reject” or
“merge” [#]_.  xxdiff takes special precautions to ensure that the file you
decide to output is complete, for example, if you answer with *merge*, it
insures that you have made a decision about all the diff hunks.

.. [#] This mode is invoked with the ``--decision`` switch, and the corresponding
       keys are ``A``, ``R`` and ``M``.


Looping and Confirming
======================

A very commonly occuring case is that of having to loop over multiple files for
changes, either from an update from a source code repository, or applying a set
of modifications to a file via a program--such as sed--and reviewing and
accepting those changes.  The high-level algorithm looks like this::

   Recurse in directories, selecting files.
   For each file selected

      Apply automated changes to the file
      OR
      Fetch the different versions of the file

      Launch xxdiff in decision mode to find out what action to perform

         xxdiff runs, while the parent script waits

      Conditionally replace the target file with the result of the merge (or
      simply, with the newer file, in case of ACCEPT).


There are many functionalities involved:

a. Recursively traversing and selecting files for processing

b. Invoking xxdiff to get the user's opinion

c. Performing the conditional replacement.  This may mean that the file has to
   be checked out of the SCM system.

d. When your original files are overwritten, first create a backup of the
   original file in case something went wrong.

e. Produce a nice-looking textual log of all the changes that were applied to
   the files.

The provided scripts allow you to carry out some of these tasks in different
combinations.


Backups
-------

File backups are automatically created.  There are a few options about where to
put the backup files:

- Along with the original files, but with an added extension, e.g.::

     source.cpp
     source.cpp.bak.1
     source.cpp.bak.2

- In a separate directory, recreating the directory hierarchy there (just for
  the backed up files).

All backup options::

  File backup options:
    These options affect automatic backup of overwritten files.

    -b CHOICE, --backup-type=CHOICE
                        Selects the backup type from: along, other, none
    --backup-dir=BACKUP_DIR
                        Specify backup directory for type 'other'

Note that if you're using the same directory for backups over multiple runs, if
some files are the same, the backed up files get overwritten (a warning is
displayed).


Write Permissions / Checkout
----------------------------

Some SCM systems require the user to *checkout* files to make them writable,
like ClearCase (under certain configurations).  There are options to do that.


Running Without Graphical Diff
------------------------------

There is a ``--no-confirm`` option that runs the transformation, accepting the
changes on all the files, producing a nice log of all the changes applied,
without querying the user with a graphical diff at all.  This is useful when
you've started confirming changes and after checking many files you've become
confident that your transformation code will not fail.  If you have a large
codebase to process, you may prefer to just apply unconditionally and them
visualize the changes in the textual side-by-side diff log.


Per-File Conditional Replacement
--------------------------------

We can easily implement the (c) part without embedding it in a loop.


``xx-cond-replace``
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

This program is akin to the UNIX command ``cp``, but its actions are conditional
to your feedback within xxdiff.  If you *accept*, the target file is overwritten
with the contents of the source file.  If you *reject*, nothing happens to the
target file.  If you *merge*, the target file is overwritten with the contents
of the merged results.

This allows you to write the produce the modified file yourself and to write the
loop in, for example, Bourne shell::

   # Remove all empty lines in files
   find . -name '*.txt' | while read i ; do 
         cat $i | tr -s \\n | xx-cond-replace - $i ;
      done

.. important:: 

   Note that for this program the backups are not enabled by default.  Since
   every invocation is separate, if the backups were on by default a unique
   backup directory would be created for each invocation.  You can imagine that
   this would create a lot of goo in the temporary directory.

   If you want to backup all the files from a loop run to a single backup
   directory root, make sure to use the ``--backup-dir`` option.


Higher-Level Loops
------------------

Many of the find-loops that occur in practice are very simple, e.g. replace a
string in all the files ending with ``.h`` and ``.cpp``.  For this purpose, we
have implemented a few scripts that perform the loop for you.  This is the
functionality mentioned as (a) in the introduction.

Selecting Files
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

These scripts all work from the same loop: a recursive walk of all the files in
a set of root directories, by default the current directory.  The selection
process embodies common patterns for selecting files.

Selecting By Filename
+++++++++++++++++++++

You can restrict and ignore files by filename, for example, to select all the
.html and .htm files, you could use::

   xx-rename -I \.svn --select='.*.htm$' --select='.*.html$' ...

.. note:: The *ignore* patterns works on directories, but the *select* patterns
          do not.

Selecting By Contents
+++++++++++++++++++++

There are switches that allow you to *grep* the files for some patterns in order
to determine if they should be processed or not, e.g.::

   xx-rename --select-grep='^#include' FROM TO

Selecting From A Fixed List
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++

You can also instruct the scripts to work on a fixed set of filenames, which you
provide via a file::

   xx-rename --select-from-file=/tmp/procfiles FROM TO

Where ``/tmp/procfiles`` would have been generated by your beforehand, in any
way you like.

All Options
+++++++++++

Here is the full set of options (as of [2006-03-31])::

  File selection options:
    These options affect which files are selected for grepping in the
    first place.

    -s REGEXP, --select=REGEXP
                        Adds a regular expression for filenames to process.
    -I REGEXP, --ignore=REGEXP
                        Adds a regular expression for filenames to ignore.
    --cpp, --select-cpp
                        Adds a regular expression for selecting C++ files to
                        match against.
    --py, --select-py   Adds a regular expression for selecting Python files
                        to match against.
    --select-grep=REGEXP
                        Further restrict the files to those which match the
                        given regular expression.
    --ignore-grep=REGEXP
                        Do not select files to those which match the given
                        regular expression.
    -f FILE, --select-from-file=FILE
                        Do not recurse through directories to find files but
                        instead read the list of filenames from the given
                        file.
    -r ROOTS, --root=ROOTS
                        Specify a root to perform the search from (default is
                        CWD).  You can use this option many timesfor multiple
                        roots.

Debugging The File Selection Process
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

To test which files are going to be selected before running your modification
command, you can use the ``--select-debug`` switch (or ``-@``) to view the list,
e.g.::

   xx-rename --cpp 'Application', 'LargeApplication' -@

Would give output like this, without running any graphical diff at all::

  /home/blais/p/xxdiff/src/builderFiles3.h
  /home/blais/p/xxdiff/src/diffutils.h
  /home/blais/p/xxdiff/src/scrollView.h
  /home/blais/p/xxdiff/src/diffs.h
  /home/blais/p/xxdiff/src/accelUtil.cpp
  /home/blais/p/xxdiff/src/app.inline.h
  ...


``xx-filter``
~~~~~~~~~~~~~

This script invokes the selection loop (a), runs a command that you specify and
invokes xxdiff on each result (c).  It basically directs the process, and runs
should UNIX filter command in a shell for you.  You command must be a filter,
that is, it takes each file as stdin and outputs the modified file as stdout.

For example, repeating the previous example::

   xx-filter 'tr -s \\n'

The output will be a log of all the decisions that were made and all
the changes that were applied, as a side-by-side log.


``xx-rename``
~~~~~~~~~~~~~

By far, the most common use case for this kind of process is that of renaming a
string or text matched by a regular expression by another string.  This works
similarly to the **sed** ``s/FROM/TO/g`` program expression.

Here is an example invocation::

   xx-rename FrobnicatorBaseClass FrobnicatorBase

Note that you can also specify more than one from/to rename pair and all the
renamings are applied in the same run, in the same order that they appear on the
command-line::

   xx-rename from1 to1 from2 to2 from3 to3


``xx-find-grep-sed``
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

This script is a relic of the past, the actual ancestor to all of this.  You
see, this used to be a Bourne shell script, before it became something called
``cc_multi``--its first Python incarnation.  We then used to perform a grep in a
subprocess, to find out if the file should be processed (if it matched the
pattern), followed by a sed subprocess to perform the actual change.

Here is an example invocation::

   xx-find-grep-sed 'class Frobni.*' 's/Frobnica/Brofnica/g'

Today we have a much more generic version of the same idea::

   xx-filter --select-grep='class Frobni.*' "sed -e 's/Frobnica/Brofnica/g'"

There ``xx-find-grep-sed`` is a bit obsolete.  I mean, it still works fine,
and I provide it to support those who already have it in their process, but
really, it should go.


``xx-pyline``
~~~~~~~~~~~~~

In the Python cookbook, `this recipe`__ proposes to compile and run a Python
expression on lines, similar to sed, but just using Python code.  With the new
scripting infrastructure, it was trivial to build another transformation program
that uses that method.  Here is an example::

   xx-pyline -m os "os.stat(line).st_size > 1024 and line"

__ http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Cookbook/Python/Recipe/437932


Writing Other Transformation Loops
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

With the provided Python package, it is quite easy to create a new program to
process a file in your own very customly way and to use the visualization and
confirmation loop described above.  You need to do the following:

#. Implement a transformer class that will perform the file transformation::

        class CustomTransformer(xxdiff.xformloop.Transformer):
            def transform( self, fn, outf ):
                text = open(fn, 'r').read()
                newtext = ... # transform text somehow
                outf.write(newtext)
                return True

   You can return False to skip the file in that method.  You can also
   initialize your transformer with the parameters of your transformation, if
   needed.

#. Add your own options and parse the arguments with the provided loop's
   method::

        import optparse
        parser = optparse.OptionParser()
        
        parser.add_option('-M', '--my-option', action='store_true',
                          help="My custom special option for my transformer.")

        opts, args, selector = xxdiff.xformloop.parse_args(parser)

#. Do your own arguments validation, if your script takes arguments.

#. Create an instance of your transformer and use our main loop to invoke it
   over the selected files::

        # Create an appropriate transformer.
        xformer = CustomTransformer(opts, <custom-arguments...>)

        xxdiff.xformloop.transform_replace_loop(
            opts, selector, xformer, sys.stdout)

Some simplistic details are omitted, but that is the gist of it.  You can use
the scripts provided with the package as examples, they all follow that pattern.


``xx-match``
============

One day, a silly man asked me the following question via email: 

  “Why is it that when I call ``xxdiff dir1/*.c dir2/*.c`` it doesn't work?”

The answer is simple: the globbing patterns get expanded *by the shell* and not
by xxdiff itself.  ``xxdiff`` only gets a large list of files, and clearly,
there isn't much it can do... almost.

I thought, “hey, maybe I can do something for this person” and I wrote
``xx-match``.  It just builds a map of basenames and runs diffs on sets of
matching basenames.  The result: it mostly works like the gentleman wanted it.

So there.

I provide the script for educational value more than anything else (or for those
who really like that syntax).

Note that the matching algorithm can be implemented separately, and therefore is
a more generic version of this available in my `pubcode
<http://furius.ca/pubcode>`_ directory: `match-files
<http://furius.ca/pubcode/pub/conf/common/bin/match-files.html>`_, e.g.::

   match-files -x '--single' dir1/*.c dir2/*.c | xargs -n2 xxdiff


CVS Support
===========

``xx-cvs-diff``
---------------

I wanted to be able to preview the changes that I had made in a CVS checkout.
This script does it.  It pulls the original versions from the server by using
``cvs diff``, which is very efficient as it provides a single file with all the
diffs (a patch).  The patch is then applied to temporary files to visualize the
changes.

Unfortunately, I never wrote much more than this for CVS, but with the new
packaged architecture of xxdiff Python code it should be easy to create new
scripts for it if you need to.

Resolving CVS Conflicts
-----------------------

Back in the days where xxdiff did not have any scripts, I implemented unmerging
of CVS conflict markers directly in xxdiff itself (should I have to do this
today I would definitely implement that in a script instead).  Just can just
invoke xxdiff with the ``--unmerge`` or ``--unmerge3`` options to do that.


Subversion Support
==================

Since 2005, I have switched my repository of files to Subversion and I will
therefore begin producing more support for this SCM.

Ignoring .svn Files In Loops
----------------------------

If you use any of the looping scripts described before in a Subversion checkout,
you can avoid changing the administrative files stored in the .svn directories
by using the following ignore option::

   xx-rename -I .svn   ...

Note that by default Subversion and CVS directories are ignored (you can disable
that with an option).


``xx-diff-proxy``
-----------------

Subversion has a diff subcommand:;

   svn diff

It also has the ability to let you specify which diff program you want to use to
actually display the diffs.  This program has to behave like GNU diff, i.e. the
options it accepts, the return value, etc.

``xx-diff-proxy`` is a script whose interface is compatible with being
invoked from Subversion, but that displays the diffs graphically rather than
textually, using xxdiff.  You can configure this per-user by adding the
following lines to your ``~/.subversion/config`` file::

   [helpers]
   diff-cmd = xx-diff-proxy
   diff3-cmd = xx-diff-proxy

.. important::  Note: there have been reports of bugs in certain cases.  I still
                need to investigate in which cases it breaks down because I have
                not had problems with it yet, I have not experienced bugs.


``xx-svn-diff``
---------------

In my opinion, Subversion provides a diff loop that is rather weak.  I want more
options in the ways that I can review my changes.  ``xx-svn-diff`` runs
``svn status`` and then loops over the files using xxdiff.

A problem with the approach described in the ``xx-diff-proxy`` section above
is that I want to *also* have normal ``svn diff`` behaviour (i.e. textual
output) and I don't want to hack my config file everytime I want to do this.

It is a good script to use instead of svn commit:

* It has an option to run ``svn-foreign`` before starting the graphical diffs,
  so you can quickly handle the unregistered files with a few keystrokes.  This
  process is enhanced with an automatic backup of the deleted files;

* It has an option to commit the files after the preview is done.  When you
  select that option, it opens a file editor with the list of files to be
  committed, which allows you to write up your merge comments to be used on the
  subsequent commit.

Future Features
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

* It would be nice to be able to optionally automatically spawn a 3-way diff for
  those files which have a newer version on the server.  This would allow you to
  preview not only your changes, but also future problems when updating and
  committing the file (before actually updating);

* It will maintain a history of the files that have been previewed already, so
  that you can easily interrupt the process and restart where you left off.

* I want to have the option to unmerge some changes and save the results
  conveniently.  And I want backup files for the original overwritten files,
  taken care of automatically;

* I would like to have a graphical or curses interface to select which files to
  view, in which order I want.

* I want to be able to review diffs between any revisions.


``xx-svn-resolve``
------------------

Subversion provides a fancier version of conflict resolution: all three files--
yours, the other and the ancestor--are provided in your checkout to help you
figure out what happened.  This is a perfect situation for xxdiff: I simply can
invoke it with the 3 files, ignoring the automatic merging that took place
within Subversion, and providing the user with the interactive merge
capabilities within xxdiff to resolve the conflicts, if possible.  

Then the user's changes can be applied automatically over the merged file and we
can call ``svn resolve`` as well to clear it (optionally).  All the versions
used to resolve the conflict are backed up before the files are removed.

This is what ``xx-svn-resolve`` does.  If you give it a directory, it also
finds and loops through all the conflicting files recursively to resolve them
graphically.


Handling Unregistered Files
---------------------------

After a long session of work in various checkouts, having to type up commands to
decide what to do with each unregistered file is a bit tiresome.  I wrote an
interactive script to handle that.

``svn-foreign``
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

This script runs an ``svn status``, outputs that for you to see, and then
queries the user for what to do with each file that is not registered with
Subversion.  You can add it, delete the file (with or without backups), mask it
(setting the ``svn:ignore`` property on the parent directory), and more.

Here is an example session::

  banane:$ svn-foreign 
  Status
  ------
  M      current/todo.txt
  ?      cv/cv.pdf
  ?      cv/cv.aux
  ?      cv/cv.log
   M     cv
  ?      reading/reviews/books/the-da-vinci-code.txt

  => [Add|Del|Mask|Ign|View|Quit]       14699  cv/cv.pdf  ? d
  Backed up to: '/tmp/svn-foreign.xYz8nm/home/blais/tmp/priv/cv/cv.pdf'
  => [Add|Del|Mask|Ign|View|Quit]           8  cv/cv.aux  ? m
  --(current svn:ignore on 'cv')--

  ----------------------------
  Add pattern (! to cancel, default: [cv.aux]):*.aux
  property 'svn:ignore' set on 'cv'
  ----------------------------

  *.aux
  ----------------------------
  => [Add|Del|Mask|Ign|View|Quit]        6265  cv/cv.log  ? d
  Backed up to: '/tmp/svn-foreign.xYz8nm/home/blais/tmp/priv/cv/cv.log'
  => [Add|Del|Mask|Ign|View|Quit]        1689  reading/reviews/books/the-da-vinci-code.txt  ? a
  A         reading/reviews/books/the-da-vinci-code.txt
  (Done.)


``svn-foreign`` is included with the xxdiff scripts, because it is used
internally by some of the them, and also because it reuses the backup module of
the xxdiff scripts.  You can copy its file separately and it will still work
(minus the backups).


Mercurial Support
=================

After version 0.9.5
-------------------

[2008-02-15] Apparently there is a new version of the merge code that
supports invoking xxdiff directly for doing merges. I have not tried
it yet, but this should become the way to go once it is released and
stable.


Before version 0.9.5
--------------------

xxdiff already works pretty well with Mercurial for viewing
differences, all you have to do is to add the following to your
``.hgrc`` file to view diffs graphically::

  [extensions]
  extdiff =

  [extdiff]
  cmd.xdiff = xxdiff
  opts.xdiff = -r

However, graphical conflict resolution during merging requires a
wrapper script that will invoke xxdiff in decision mode and that will
automatically save the merge results where Mercurial expects them. The
script is called ``xx-hg-merge``, and you will need to add the
following to your ``.hgrc``::

  [ui]
  merge = xx-hg-merge


Encrypted Files
===============

I maintain some of my more sensitive personal data in ascii-armored encrypted
files in an CVS/Subversion repository.  I can open, modify and save the files
from within Emacs without ever writing a non-encrypted version on disk.  This
means that if I edit the files in two different machines, the merge operation
will surely fail, because the encrypted file does not merge.  This happens
rarely, but when it does, it is quite a problem: for each of the conflicting
file, I must: 

* Find the original file;
* Rebuild my local file somehow, from the file with the conflicts in it;
* Decrypt both files;
* Launch xxdiff and resolve the conflict;
* Encrypt the new, merged file;
* And most importantly: make sure I do not forget to *remove the decrypted files
  from disk*.  If the files are encrypted, there is a reason, and you don't want
  to leave plaintext version of the data on disk.

This is quite time-consuming.  Let's automate!

``xx-encrypted``
----------------

This script will do all of the above for two encryped files, and it also
attempts to minimize the amount of time that a decrypted file will live on
disk--if needed at all.  In the cases where it needs to temporarily write
decrypted text to disk, as soon as xxdiff finished gulping the files in, it
deletes them right away.   This is not the super-dooper safest way of doing
this, but it sure beats doing it all by hand [#]_.

It also supports unmerging CVS conflict markers in order to obtain the original
and the new file automatically.  For example::

   xx-encrypted --unmerge  my_secrets.asc
   
.. [#] xxdiff could be enhanced to accept input from multiple file descriptors
       to avoid having to use temporary files in most cases.  This just has not
       been done yet.


Pre-Visualizing And Cherry-Picking From Patches
===============================================

I would like to be able to apply a patch to a temporary copy of a set of files,
and then to visualize the patch's changes, pick and choose the ones that we want
using xxdiff, and apply them to the original files.  I have started doing some
work on this in the ``xx-patch`` program, but there remains some unsolved
issues:

* How do we deal with failed hunks?  What do we do with them?  How do we present
  them to the user?

* How do we insure that our patch selected from the merged output will apply
  correctly?

* How do we deal with added and deleted files?

For these reasons, until I find a good solution for all of these problems, the
``xx-patch`` code remains hidden in the codebase.  If you're interested in
working on this let me know.


Comparing SQL Schemas
=====================

One annoying problem is that of migrating a database from one schema to
another.  A typical web application setup has the stable codebase running on the
server, and test setup running the some other machine, on which the programmer
makes changes and develops new features.

In the course of doing so, a database-based application involves changing the
database schema, that is, adding columns, changing types, tables, indexes, and
the like.  In an ideal world, a developer would be careful to take note of all
the required changes.  Oh, by the way, we're not living in an ideal world.

One problem is that when upgrading the code of the application on the production
machine, the existing database has to be migrated to fit the new schema that
corresponds to the new code.  This is usually carried out “by hand” on the
database's shell interface, or by writing a script (if you're a Python hacker),
and can be quite tricky, it is very easy to forget some things and to make
mistakes.

Since we're in the business of comparing things, I wrote a script that fetches
the schemas of two databases, parses the schema description, outputs two files
with appropriate garbage so that corresponding objects line up when diffed, and
I run xxdiff on them.  This results in a nice side-by-side view of the
differences between the objects of the two schemas, and allows you to clearly
view what needs to be carried out for the database migration task.

Currently, only the PostgreSQL database is supported, but it would be
quasi-trivial to add support for other databases.

.. figure:: screenshot-sql-schema-compare.png

   SQL Schema comparison.


xxdiff can be used to compare pairs of corresponding objects, and I'm sure that
there are many other exciting uses that people can apply it to.


Writing Your Own Scripts
========================

Use the provided scripts as examples.  There are many convenient functions in
the package that you can leverage from to write your own processing scripts
around xxdiff.


Questions
=========

Any questions should be directed to Martin Blais <blais@furius.ca>.
Contributions appreciated.  If you find these programs useful, drop me a note.

